An adult case of laryngopharyngeal burn by drinking hot water

His partner initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) following advice from the emergency services advisor over the phone. On arrival, the ambulance first responder performed an emergency tracheostomy at the scene. CPR was on-going on arrival to the Emergency Department. The electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrated ineffective cardiac activity and after 25 min CPR was abandoned and the patient was confirmed deceased.

Fatal laryngeal burn from ingestion of a hot fish cake: Case report and literature review

Received 2020 Feb 26; Revised 2020 Apr 21; Accepted 2020 Apr 23; Collection date 2020.

© 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

PMCID: PMC7365770 PMID: 32527705

Highlights

• • Laryngeal burns from hot food ingestion are rare but potentially life-threatening.
• • There is often a delay between thermal insult and progression of laryngeal oedema.
• • Laryngeal oedema may occur in the absence of oropharyngeal signs of thermal injury.
• • Clinicians should have a low threshold for referral to ENT for flexible laryngoscopy.
• • Definitive airway management with intubation or tracheostomy may be required.

Keywords: Larygeal burn, Fatal, Thermal epiglottitis, Hot food, Case report

Abstract

Introduction

Laryngeal burn from hot food ingestion is a rare but potentially life-threatening presentation. It is essential that clinicians have a high index of suspicion of potential airway obstruction in such cases. To our knowledge, this is the only case of fatal laryngeal oedema caused by hot solid food ingestion reported in the literature.

Presentation of case

A 51 year old male presented to the Emergency Department complaining of a burn to the throat following ingestion of a piping hot fish cake. On initial assessment he reported only mild pain and increased saliva production. There was no evidence of stridor, dysphagia, dyspnoea or aspiration and hence the patient was discharged and advised to return if he experienced any worsening of his symptoms. 2 h later the patient collapsed at home and died due to airway obstruction from delayed laryngeal oedema.

Discussion

27 cases of laryngeal burn from ingestion of hot food or liquid were identified in the literature. Only one fatality following ingestion of hot liquid has been reported. This is the first documented fatal laryngeal burn due to ingestion of hot solid food. At present, there are no guidelines for the assessment and management of laryngeal contact burns.

Conclusion

Patients may be relatively asymptomatic immediately after thermal injury to the larynx. Endoscopic examination of the larynx is required to identify laryngeal oedema. Any sign of thermal injury to the laryngeal mucosa warrants admission for observation and definitive management of the airway should be considered.

1. Introduction

Thermal burns to the oral cavity and oropharynx from hot food are very common and normally inconsequential. However, thermal injury to the larynx can cause potentially fatal laryngeal or supraglottic oedema. Oedema can progress many hours after the initial injury. Emergency physicians and junior grade Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) doctors are likely to be the clinicians seeing this presentation in the first instance. Thus, it is essential for frontline clinicians to recognise the seriousness of this presentation and be familiar with the initial assessment and management. This case has been reported in line with the SCARE criteria [1].

2. Presentation of case

A 51-year old Caucasian male self-presented to the Emergency Department of his local District General Hospital complaining of a burn to the throat following ingestion of a piping hot fish cake. On arrival he was triaged, and deemed suitable for review in the Urgent Care Centre to be seen by a General Practitioner or Advanced Nurse Practitioner. Of note, the patient had suffered an ischaemic stroke 7 years prior, and spent 18 months in stroke rehabilitation. Despite rehabilitation, the patient was left with a baseline moderate speech deficit and occasionally aspirated upon swallowing. He was assessed by an Advanced Nurse Practitioner and at that time his speech was deemed to be at baseline fluency. The patient noticed mild dysphonia which he reported this to his partner, but not to the assessing clinician. He complained of an increase in saliva production. He denied any odynophagia, dysphagia, shortness of breath or history of aspiration. On examination, his observations were all within normal limits. There was no stridor and auscultation of his chest was unremarkable. His case was discussed with the ENT Senior House Officer (SHO) on-call based at the nearby Teaching Hospital. Given the patient was stable and relatively asymptomatic, he was discharged and advised to return if there was any worsening of his symptoms.

2 h later the patient complained of increasing throat pain to his partner. He felt unwell and went to lie down. 15 min later he called out for his partner then subsequently collapsed at home.

His partner initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) following advice from the emergency services advisor over the phone. On arrival, the ambulance first responder performed an emergency tracheostomy at the scene. CPR was on-going on arrival to the Emergency Department. The electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrated ineffective cardiac activity and after 25 min CPR was abandoned and the patient was confirmed deceased.

Post-mortem examination revealed a swollen epiglottis and significant swelling of the left aryepiglottic fold. There was no oedema of the true or false vocal cords and the glottic airway was patent. The tracheostomy was inserted appropriately below the cricoid cartilage. A lack of mast cells or eosinophils in the tissues suggested the swelling was not secondary to anaphylaxis. It was concluded that cause of death was asphyxia secondary to delayed swelling of the upper airway due to thermal injury (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Images adapted from (2) with permission. (Patient presented in this case report did not have endoscopic evaluation.) Views from flexible laryngoscopy in 81 year old male following ingestion of microwaved meat stew. Image a: Initial examination following thermal contact burn. 1 = normal epiglottis anteriorly. 2 = mucosal oedema of arytenoids with pooling of saliva posteriorly. Image b: Four days post-injury. 3 = White plaques of healing mucosa in arytenoid region. Image c: Healed mucosa at one week follow up.

3. Discussion

Minor burns to the oral cavity from ingestion of hot food or beverages are common. As a reflex, the hot food or drink is usually expelled immediately. These burns are often mild and managed conservatively. However, in rare cases thermal burns can be fatal if they extend deeper to affect the hypopharynx and larynx. To date, there have been 27 reported cases of laryngeal burn secondary to hot food or beverage ingestion dating back to 1977 (2–26). Burns following hot beverage consumption were more frequently reported (n = 16) than burns associated with hot food (n = 11). To our knowledge, this is the first fatal laryngeal burn caused by hot solid food ingestion reported in the literature. There has been one reported case of a fatal burn sustained following ingestion of a hot beverage in a psychiatric patient [15].

Nearly half of all reported cases (n = 13) involved children and almost all of these involved hot liquid ingestion [[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13],19,20]. Particularly with young children, clinicians should be aware that laryngeal burns can be sustainted following facial scald burns and subsequent steam inhalation, without actual ingestion of the hot liquid [27,28].

In adults, mental ill-health may also be a risk factor for laryngeal burns following hot food or drink ingestion [3,15,17,18]. Indeed, the one fatal larygeal burn in the literature occured when a schizophrenic patient rapidly drank a cup of hot coffee. 6 h later he developed respiratory distress. His combative behaviour prevented appropriate evaluation and he suffered a respiratory arrest [15].

In the case presented here, the injury was sustained following ingestion of a hot fish cake which came fresh out of the deep fryer. It is unclear whether his previous stroke had resulted in an oropharyngeal sensory deficit which allowed the patient to swallow the piping hot food item. Interestingly, the use of dentures may reduce oral heat perception, allowing contact laryngeal burns to occur [2].

Microwave heated food and drink was implicated in 7 of the cases reported in the literature [2,4,5,10,14,16,24]. The dielectric heating mechanism of microwaves results in heterogenous heating of food. This creates internal “hot spots” within the food item, allowing the food to bypass the oropharynx and subject the epiglottis or larynx to an intense thermal insult [24].

Currently, there are no guidelines for the assessment and management of laryngeal contact burns. However, there is a wealth of literature on inhalation injury in the context of burns management. The International Society for Burn Injuries (ISBI) have produced a guidance document which includes recommendations for inhalation injury [29]. Assessing and protecting the airway in a thermally injured patient is paramount. Clinicians are advised to have a high clinical suspicion for the development of airway obstruction and a low threshold for intubation in burns patients. Our case report would suggest that contact laryngeal burns from hot food should also be treated with a similar degree of suspicion. Clinical signs such as stridor, dysphonia, drooling and bilstering of the oropharyngeal mucosa are suggestive of impending airway obstruction. Our patient’s previous stroke had left him with a baseline speech deficit. This may have made it difficult for the assessing clinician to recognise new dysphonia suggestive of laryngeal oedema.

Crucially, the development of airway oedema following thermal injury may be delayed in onset. The timing and severity of airway oedema is difficult to predict accurately. Airway obstruction occurs when oedema develops in the epiglottis and supraglottic airway [30]. Indeed, some papers call this phenomenon ‘thermal epiglottitis’ [6,8,12,17,18,28]. Maximal oedema usually occurs between 8 and 36 h after the inital insult, and lasts for up to 4 days [30,31]. It is often seen following aggressive fluid resuscitation, more so in the context of patients who have also sustained concurrent cutaneous burns [30].

Fibreoptic evaluation with flexible nasendoscope is essential to definitively diagnose supraglottic oedema. Normal endoscopic appearance of the larynx can be reassuring in patients where the history and clinical signs are suggestive of a thermal injury to the larynx. However, due to the potential delayed onset of laryngeal oedema these patients should be observed and repeat fibreoptic evaluation is warranted, particularly if there is clinical deterioration.

In confirmed upper airway burns, patients should be nursed in a semi-upright position to improve venous and lympahtic drainage, thus reducing airway oedema [29]. Endotracheal intubation is indicated if airway compromise occurs. In the infective epiglottitis literature, prophylactic intubation in children is recommended if there is any sign of airway compromise [32]. Accordingly, 12 of the 13 reported paediatric cases of thermal epiglottitis were indeed intubated (See Table 1). Tracheostomy is only indicated if the patient cannot be intubated due to swelling, or when prolonged mechanical ventilation is anticipated [33].

Table 1.

Cases of thermal burns to the larynx caused by food or beverages reported in the the literature.

Lead Author (ref)	Year	Adult / Paeds	Steroids	Antibiotics	Intubation	Tracheostomy	Food / Drink	Confounding Factors	Adverse Outcome
Jung [3]	1977	adult	–	+	–	+	coffee	mental health
Sando [4]	1984	paeds	–	+	–	–	milk	microwave
Garland [5]	1986	paeds	+	+	+	–	tea	microwave
Kulick [6]	1988	paeds	+	+	+	–	beverage
Brahams [7]	1989	paeds	+	–	+	–	tea	brain damage
Laufkoetter [8]	1989	paeds	+	+	+	–	vegetables
Dye [9]	1990	paeds	–	+	+	–	tea
Dye [9]	1990	paeds	–	–	+	–	water
Goldberg [10]	1990	adult	+	+	–	–	potato	microwave
Mazrooa [11]	1990	paeds	+	–	+	–	tea
Harjacek [12]	1992	paeds	–	+	+	–	tea
Williams [13]	1993	paeds	+	+	+	–	tea
Ford [14]	1994	adult	+	+	–	–	treacle tart	microwave
Mellen [15]	1995	adult	–	–	–	–	coffee	mental health	death
Offer [16]	1995	adult	+	–	+	–	jacket potato	microwave
Kornak [17]	1996	adult	–	+	–	–	tomato	mental health
Ma [18]	1996	adult	+	+	–	–	stewed tomato	mental health
Watts [19]	1996	paeds	–	–	+	–	tea
Lai [20]	2000	paeds	+	+	+	–	water
Goto [21]	2002	adult	+	+	–	–	milk	intoxication
Alpay [22]	2008	adult	+	+	–	–	water
Shenoy [23]	2009	adult	+	+	–	–	food
Silberman [24]	2013	adult	+	–	+	–	lasagne	microwave
Iyama [25]	2016	adult	–	–	+	–	water
Hyo [2]	2017	adult	+	+	–	+	bun	microwave, dentures
Hyo [2]	2017	adult	+	+	–	–	meat stew	dentures
Inaguma [26]	2019	paeds	+	+	+	–	tofu
Chu	2020	adult	–	–	–	–	fish cake	previous stroke	death

Interestingly, studies from the burns literature suggest that corticosteroids and antibiotics should not be given in the inital treatment of thermal inhalation injuries [29,34]. It is not clear whether this applies to the management of airway oedema secondary to laryngeal contact burns. However, in most of the reported cases the patients were given both intravenous (IV) steroid and empirical antibiotics (see Table 1). The likely rationale is that these patients were treated in the same manner as one would manage acute infectious epiglottitis. There is no high quality evidence showing that corticosteroids reduces the need for intubation, duration of intubation or duration of hospital stay in the acute epiglottitis literature. However, one retrospective cohort study showed that IV steroid use reduced length of hospital stay in acute epiglottitis managed on the intensive care unit (ICU) [35].

4. Conclusion

In summary, we report the first case of a patient who died from asphyxia secondary to delayed laryngeal oedema as a result of thermal injury to the larynx from rapid ingestion of a hot food item. This is an extremely uncommon mechanism of sustaining a laryngeal burn and highlights the perils of thermal injury to the upper aerodigestive tract, regardless of how innocuous the insult may seem. Endoscopic examination of the larynx is essential to rule out laryngeal oedema. Any sign of thermal injury to the laryngeal mucosa warrants admission for observation and definitive management of the airway should be considered.

Declaration of Competing Interest

Nothing to declare.

Funding

Nothing to declare.

Ethical approval

This study is exempt from ethical approval in our institution. This is not an original research study.

Consent

Written informed consent was not obtained from the patient. The head of our medical team has taken responsibility that exhaustive attempts have been made to contact the family and that the paper has been sufficiently anonymised not to cause harm to the patient or their family. A copy of a signed document stating this is available for review by the Editorin-Chief of this journal on request.

Author contribution

Michael Chu: conceptualization, writing – original draft, visualization.

Antonia Tse: writing – review and editing.

Ileana Anderco: writing – review and editing.

Arun Cardozo: conceptualization, supervision, project administration, writing – review and editing.

Registration of research studies

• 1. Name of the registry: n/a.
• 2. Unique identifying number or registration ID: n/a.
• 3. Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked): n/a.

Guarantor

Michael Chu – lead author.

Arun Cardozo – supervisor.

References

• 1. Agha R.A., Borrelli M.R., Farwana R., Koshy K., Fowler A.J., Orgill D.P. The SCARE 2018 statement: updating consensus surgical Case Report (SCARE) guidelines. Int. J. Surg. 2018;60:132–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 2. Hyo Y., Fukutsuji K., Fukushima H., Harada T. Two cases of thermal burns of the larynx in older men. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017;44(5):620–623. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 3. Jung R.C., Gottlieb L.S. Respiratory tract burns after aspiration of hot coffee. Chest. 1977;72(1):125–128. doi: 10.1378/chest.72.1.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 4. Sando W.C., Gallaher K.J., Rodgers B.M. Risk factors for microwave scald injuries in infants. J. Pediatr. 1984;105(6):864–867. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)80067-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 5. Garland J.S., Rice T.B., Kelly K.J. Airway burns in an infant following aspiration of microwave-heated tea. Chest. 1986;90(4):621–622. doi: 10.1378/chest.90.4.621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 6. Kulick R.M., Selbst S.M., Baker M.D., Woodward G.A. Thermal epiglottitis after swallowing hot beverages. Pediatrics. 1988;81(3):441–444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 7. Brahams D. Aspiration of boiling tea leading to respiratory failure. Lancet. 1989;1(8646):1089. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92495-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 8. Laufkötter E.A. Thermal epiglottitis in a 3-month-old infant following feeding of hot vegetables. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1989;137(3):168–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 9. Dye D.J., Milling M.A., Emmanuel E.R., Craddock K.V. Toddlers, teapots, and kettles: beware intraoral scalds. BMJ. 1990;300(6724):597–598. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6724.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 10. Goldberg R.M., Lee S., Line W.S., Jr. Laryngeal burns secondary to the ingestion of microwave-heated food. J. Emerg. Med. 1990;8(3):281–283. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(90)90006-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 11. Mazrooa A.A., Sissi W.A. Aspiration of hot tea. Anaesthesia. 1990;45(10):884. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14583.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 12. Harjacek M., Kornberg A.E., Yates E.W., Montgomery P. Thermal epiglottitis after swallowing hot tea. Pediatr. Emerg. Care. 1992;8(6):342–344. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199212000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 13. Williams E.G., Dymock M. Acute airway obstruction after aspiration of boiling tea from teapot spout. BMJ. 1993;307(6909):923-. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6909.923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 14. Ford G.R., Horrocks C.L. Hazards of microwave cooking: direct thermal damage to the pharynx and larynx. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1994;108(6):509–510. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100127264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 15. Mellen P.F., Golle M.F., Jr., Smialek J.E. Fatal hot coffee scald of the larynx. Case report. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 1995;16(2):117–119. doi: 10.1097/00000433-199506000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 16. Offer G.J., Nanan D., Marshall J.N. Thermal injury to the upper aerodigestive tract after microwave heating of food. J. Accid. Emerg. Med. 1995;12(3):216–217. doi: 10.1136/emj.12.3.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 17. Kornak J.M., Freije J.E., Campbell B.H. Caustic and thermal epiglottitis in the adult. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1996;114(2):310–312. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989670192-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 18. Ma O.J., Phelan M.B. Adult thermal epiglottitis. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1996;27(5):675. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70178-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 19. Watts A.M., McCallum M.I. Acute airway obstruction following facial scalding: differential diagnosis between a thermal and infective cause. Burns. 1996;22(7):570–573. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(96)00032-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 20. Lai S.H., Wong K.S., Liao S.L., Chou Y.H. Non-infectious epiglottitis in children: two cases report. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;55(1):57–60. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(00)00376-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 21. Goto R., Miyabe K., Mori N. Thermal burn of the pharynx and larynx after swallowing hot milk. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2002;29(3):301–303. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(02)00008-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 22. Alpay H.C., Kaygusuz I., Karlidag T., Orhan I. Thermal burn of the larynx in an adult following hot water aspiration. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(1):164–165. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 23. Shenoy V.N., Chandrashekar K.B., Pai S. Acute thermal ulceration of the epiglottis. J. Miss State Med. Assoc. 2009;50(8):259–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 24. Silberman M., Jeanmonod R. Aerodigestive tract burn from ingestion of microwaved food. Case Rep. Emerg. Med. 2013;2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/781809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 25. Iyama K., Ueki T., Yamano S., Tajima G., Inokuma T., Hirao T. An adult case of laryngopharyngeal burn by drinking hot water. Acute Med. Surg. 2016;4(2):198–201. doi: 10.1002/ams2.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 26. Inaguma Y., Matsui S., Kusumoto M., Kurosawa H., Tanaka R. Thermal epiglottitis: acute airway obstruction caused by ingestion of hot food. Pediatr. Int. 2019;61(9):927–929. doi: 10.1111/ped.13948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 27. Kudchadkar S.R., Hamrick J.T., Mai C.L., Berkowitz I., Tunkel D. The heat is on… thermal epiglottitis as a late presentation of airway steam injury. J. Emerg. Med. 2014;46(2):e43–e46. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 28. Verhees V., Ketharanathan N., Oen I.M.M.H., Baartmans M.G.A., Koopman J.S.H.A. Beware of thermal epiglottis! A case report describing’ teapot syndrome’. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0665-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 29. Committee IPG, Steering S., Advisory S. ISBI practice guidelines for burn care. Burns. 2016;42(5):953–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 30. Oscier C., Emerson B., Handy J.M. New perspectives on airway management in acutely burned patients. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(2):105–110. doi: 10.1111/anae.12565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 31. Monafo W.W. Initial management of burns. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996;335(21):1581–1586. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199611213352108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 32. DynaMed . EBSCO Information Services; Ipswich (MA): 1995. Acute Epiglottitis. [updated 2018 Nov 30, cited 21/02/20]. DynaMed [Internet] Record No. T115468. [Google Scholar]
• 33. Walker P.F., Buehner M.F., Wood L.A., Boyer N.L., Driscoll I.R., Lundy J.B. Diagnosis and management of inhalation injury: an updated review. Crit. Care. 2015;19:351. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1077-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 34. Thamm O.C., Perbix W., Zinser M.J., Koenen P., Wafaisade A., Maegele M. Early single-shot intravenous steroids do not affect pulmonary complications and mortality in burned or scalded patients. Burns. 2013;39(5):935–941. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 35. Guardiani E., Bliss M., Harley E. Supraglottitis in the era following widespread immunization against Haemophilus influenzae type B: evolving principles in diagnosis and management. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(11):2183–2188. doi: 10.1002/lary.21083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Surgery Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

ACTIONS

• View on publisher site
• PDF (638.5 KB)
• Cite
• Collections
• Permalink

An adult case of laryngopharyngeal burn by drinking hot water

Corresponding: Osamu Tasaki, MD, PhD, Nagasaki University Hospital Emergency Medical Center, 1‐7‐1, Sakamoto, Nagasaki‐shi, Nagasaki, 852‐8501, Japan, E‐mail: [email protected] .

Received 2016 May 26; Accepted 2016 Jul 21; Collection date 2017 Apr.

© 2016 The Authors. Acute Medicine and Surgery published by John Wiley and Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

PMCID: PMC5667262 PMID: 29123861

Abstract

Case

A 61‐year‐old man who was hospitalized with schizophrenia in a psychiatric hospital drank hot water estimated to be 90°C. Eight hours after injury, laryngopharynx edema gradually progressed, and his breathing deteriorated. Upon arrival at our emergency room, we secured his respiratory tract by nasal intubation under a bronchoscope.

Outcome

The edema gradually improved after peaking at hospital day 2, and he was extubated on hospital day 18. There were no apparent respiratory or esophageal problems, and he was discharged back to the psychiatric hospital on day 28.

Conclusion

These types of laryngopharynx burns caused by ingesting hot foods or drinks have been rarely reported for adults. In cases of adults, when the patient is in a special situation such as having a psychiatric disorder, it is necessary to assume that the laryngopharynx burns might be aggravated.

Keywords: Adult, airway management, edema, laryngopharynx

Introduction

Intraoral and laryngopharynx (ILP) thermal burn injuries caused by accidentally swallowing hot beverages generally occur in infants; it is extremely rare in adults and few adult cases have been reported.1 Although these types of burns to the ILP area usually result in minor injuries, some cases can be much more serious and require airway management. Here we report an adult case of a severe laryngopharynx burn associated with drinking hot water which required airway management.

Case

A 61‐year‐old man, who had been hospitalized for schizophrenia at a psychiatric hospital, drank hot water from a hot water supply device (setting at 90°C) at approximately 01:00 am . Intraoral edema gradually progressed, and his breathing condition deteriorated. The psychiatrist made a telephone call to our hospital for a hospital transfer request at 09:00 am , 8 h after the injury. We judged that it was a respiratory tract emergency and traveled to the psychiatric hospital by rapid response car. On arrival we were able to maintain his SpO₂ at ≥90% by bag valve mask ventilation and intraoral suction, and he was taken to our hospital by ambulance.

On arrival at our emergency room, the patient was drooling and wheezing. His SpO₂ was approximately 80% by bag valve mask ventilation, and his Glasgow Coma Scale score was E3V1M5. Because the urgent airway management was necessary, we took into account a cricothyroidotomy. While preparing for the cricothyroidotomy, we first tried nasal intubation under a bronchoscope and succeeded at intubation; therefore, cricothyroidotomy was not required. The patient’s lips were extremely edematous at the time of intubation (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Swelling of lips and tongue in a 61‐year‐old man with schizophrenia who drank hot water estimated to be 90°C. Photographs were taken immediately after intubation (A), 20 h after the injury (B), and 6 days after the injury (C).

When we evaluated the intraoral area using a bronchoscope, we could see that it was erythrogenic with a swollen epiglottis (Fig. 2A). There was an extremely narrow space around the tube in the ILP area because of the swelling (Fig. 2A, B).

Figure 2.

Pictures after the nasal intubation of a 61‐year‐old man with schizophrenia who drank hot water estimated to be 90°C. A, The larynx as observed using a bronchoscope immediately after intubation. B, Computed tomography of the larynx area, showing the intubation tube (yellow arrow). C, Schema of photograph A illustrating the swollen epiglottis (i) and the intubation tube (ii).

The edema gradually worsened and peaked approximately 20 h after the injury (Fig. 1B). As the edema gradually improved during ventilator management (Fig. 1C), the patient was ready to be extubated on hospital day 11, based on the existence of cuff‐leak and no ILP edema from endoscopic findings. However, he developed pneumonia during ventilator management; therefore, the extubation was postponed until respiratory function had recovered. He was eventually extubated on hospital day 18. In addition, we used methylprednisolone before the extubation for the prophylaxis of postextubation stridor. He was discharged back to the psychiatric hospital on hospital day 28 and had no respiratory or esophageal problems clinically at that time. He still had no swallowing dysfunction 20 months later.

Discussion

We experienced a rare case of an adult severe thermal ILP burn injury, which needed airway management. Burn injuries to the ILP area caused by hot foods or drinks are mainly seen in infants, and adult cases are extremely rare with few reports published (Table 1).1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Adult cases are not usually severe because it is impossible to ingest food and drink that are at a high temperature. Injuries are mild in most adult cases and can be medically treated without any sequelae.8 However, when injuries are severe, there is a risk of respiratory tract emergency and esophageal stenosis.

Table 1.

Published reports of adult cases of intraoral and laryngopharynx burn injuries caused by hot foods or drinks

Age, years	Sex	Hot food or drink	Intubation	Treatment	Year	Reference no.
28	Female	Coffee	(+)	Tracheostomy	1977	2
29	Male	Treacle tart heated by microwave oven	(−)	Intravenous steroids	1994	3
21	Male	Potato heated by microwave oven	(−)	Intravenous steroids	1995	4
51	Male	Stewed tomato	(−)	Intravenous steroids	1996	5
59	Male	Milk that had been in boiling water	(−)	Intravenous steroids	2002	1
43	Male	Water	(−)	Intravenous steroids	2008	6
79	Male	Lasagna heated by microwave oven	(−)	Intravenous steroids	2013	7
28	Male	Coffee	(+)	Tracheostomy	2013	8

In cases of laryngeal burn injuries, laryngeal edema usually peaks within 6–24 h after the injury and then gradually improves.9 In this case, our first contact with the patient was 8 h after the injury when laryngeal edema was obvious and airway management was necessary. His edema peaked 20 h after the injury (Fig. 1B), similar to that in a previous report.9

In addition, esophageal cicatricial strictures after thermal burns are rare.7 In this case, the patient had no clinical problem in the esophagus. The reasons why he did not have esophageal cicatricial stricture might be that the volume of hot beverages consumed was smaller compared to the case with esophageal stenosis, or he might have kept hot water in his mouth for a considerably long time to try and swallow but eventually ejected it.

In this case, we did not use steroids for the treatment of ILP thermal burn injury. There are some reports1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of cases treated with steroids, as observed in the case of acute epiglottitis. However, there is no definite evidence for laryngeal thermal burns; moreover, a standard treatment for adult laryngeal burns has not yet been established. It is controversial that laryngeal burns are traditionally treated with antibiotics and steroids.1 Further studies are warranted for the treatment of ILP thermal burns.

In most adult cases, injuries are relatively mild, airway management is unnecessary, and medical treatment includes the use of steroids (Table 1). Cases that required surgical airway management were thought to have occurred due to swallowing a large quantity of food or drink before realizing that it was hot. We found only two published cases that required a tracheostomy (Table 1). Reference case #2 had a psychiatric disorder similar to our case. Reference case #8 drank a gulp of hot coffee in a punishment game.

In our case, the patient originally had water intoxication because of schizophrenia, and he might have actively drunk the hot water, causing the severe burn injuries. Thus, even in an adult case, when the patient has a psychiatric disorder as an underlying disease or is in a special situation, it is necessary to assume that an intraoral and/or laryngopharynx burn caused by hot foods or drinks might be aggravated.

Conflict of Interest

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by a Grant‐in‐Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan (25293366).

[The copyright line for this article was changed on 1 November 2016 after original online publication]

References

• 1. Goto R, Miyabe K, Mori N. Thermal burn of the pharynx and larynx after swallowing hot milk. Auris Nasus Larynx 2002; 29: 301–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 2. Jung RC, Gottlieb LS. Respiratory tract burns after aspiration of hot coffee. Chest 1977; 72: 125–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 3. Ford GR, Horrocks CL. Hazards of microwave cooking: direct thermal damage to the pharynx and larynx. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1994; 108: 509–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 4. Offer GJ, Nanan D, Marshall JN. Thermal injury to the upper aerodigestive tract after microwave heating of food. J. Accid. Emerg. Med. 1995; 12: 216–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 5. Ma OJ, Phelan MB. Adult thermal epiglottitis. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1996; 27: 675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 6. Alpay HC, Kaygusuz I, Karlidag T, Orhan I. Thermal burn of the larynx in an adult following hot water aspiration. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2008; 139: 164–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 7. Silberman M, Jeanmonod R. Aerodigestive tract burn from ingestion of microwaved food. Case Rep. Emerg. Med. 2013; 2013: 781809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 8. Matsumoto H, Nakata Y, Ebihara K, et al Pharyngolaryngeal and esophageal thermal injuries after hot beverage ingestion: a case report. JJAAM 2013; 24: 877–85. [Google Scholar]
• 9. Inoue T, Sugiki D, Ikegami K, et al Indications for endotracheal intubation in patients with inhalation injury of the larynx. JJAAM 2008; 19: 262–71. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acute Medicine and Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wiley

ACTIONS

• View on publisher site
• PDF (373.1 KB)
• Cite
• Collections
• Permalink